FundingPips vs Lucid Trading (2026): rules, payouts, fees and AI visibility compared
Advertiser disclosure: some links on this page may be affiliate links, meaning BrokerCatalogue may earn a commission if you buy an evaluation. This never affects the data shown here, which is drawn from our catalogue and compared mechanically. How we make money.
Data refreshed 24 Sep 2026 · Compiled by David Ispiryan · FundingPips facts verified by BrokerCatalogue research desk (from the firm's own site) on 2026-09-24 · Lucid Trading facts verified by BrokerCatalogue research desk (from the firm's own site) on 2026-09-24
AI visibility score 24.6 / 100 · AI visibility rank #5 · Founded 2022
FundingPips is a proprietary trading firm based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, founded in 2022. It offers one-step, two-step, instant-funding evaluations on forex, indices, commodities, crypto. Funded accounts go up to $100,000…
AI visibility score 3.3 / 100 · AI visibility rank #24 · Founded 2024
Lucid Trading is a proprietary trading firm based in Dover, United States, founded in 2024. It offers one-step, instant-funding evaluations on futures. Funded accounts go up to $150,000 (up to 5 funded…
FundingPips (Dubai, United Arab Emirates, founded 2022) scores 24.6 / 100 on the Q3 2026 AI Visibility Index (rank #5 of 76 prop firms), named in 33% of AI answers, runs Instant funding, One-step, Two-step evaluations, funds accounts up to $100,000 (up to $200,000 on selected models), pays a 80% (60% weekly, 90% on demand, 100% monthly) profit split and offers cTrader, MT5. Lucid Trading (Dover, United States, founded 2024) scores 3.3 / 100 on the Q3 2026 AI Visibility Index (rank #24 of 76 prop firms), named in 5% of AI answers, runs Instant funding, One-step evaluations, funds accounts up to $150,000 (up to 5 funded accounts) and offers MotiveWave, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Rithmic, Tradesea, Tradovate.
Verdict at a glance
FundingPips leads on AI visibility, how often AI names it, AI sentiment, track record, choice of evaluation models and asset-class range.
Lucid Trading leads on platform choice and maximum allocation.
Scored on 8 measurable dimensions where both prop firms have verified data. Dimensions missing for either side are excluded rather than guessed. This is a data summary, not a recommendation.
weekly (Tuesday), bi-weekly, on demand or monthly (split varies)
same-day (about 15 minutes from request to bank per site)
Daily drawdown limit
5%
Not verified
Maximum drawdown
10%
Not verified
Minimum trading days
3
Not verified
Time limit
none
none
Weekend holding
Not verified
No
Status
active
active
Highlighted cells mark the stronger value where a direction is objectively better (e.g. more licences, lower fees). "Not verified" means the field is not yet in our catalogue for that prop firm — we never fill gaps with estimates.
AI visibility by engine: FundingPips vs Lucid Trading
Engine
FundingPips
Lucid Trading
ChatGPT
10.6
2.1
Perplexity
16.7
2.5
Gemini
56.2
1.9
Claude
23.2
8.4
Google AI Mode
41.6
3.2
Google AI Overview
12.4
21.8
Google top-10
0.5
0
Scores 0–100 from the Pipswire AI Visibility Index, Q3 2026. Higher means the engine names the firm more often and more favourably.
FundingPips vs Lucid Trading: common questions
Which prop firm do AI assistants recommend more, FundingPips or Lucid Trading?
FundingPips scores higher on the Q3 2026 Pipswire AI Visibility Index (24.6 / 100 vs 3.3 / 100), which measures how often ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google name a firm when traders ask which prop firm to use.
Which platforms do FundingPips and Lucid Trading support?
Risk warning: prop firms are not regulated brokers or investment firms. Evaluations are paid, fees are usually non-refundable, most accounts are simulated, and a firm can change its rules or stop paying out. Most participants fail the evaluation. Nothing on this page is financial advice; read the firm's terms before you pay. Full risk disclosure.