FundingPips vs OneUp Trader (2026): rules, payouts, fees and AI visibility compared
Advertiser disclosure: some links on this page may be affiliate links, meaning BrokerCatalogue may earn a commission if you buy an evaluation. This never affects the data shown here, which is drawn from our catalogue and compared mechanically. How we make money.
Data refreshed 24 Sep 2026 · Compiled by David Ispiryan · FundingPips facts verified by BrokerCatalogue research desk (from the firm's own site) on 2026-09-24 · OneUp Trader facts verified by BrokerCatalogue research desk (from the firm's own site) on 2026-09-24
AI visibility score 24.6 / 100 · AI visibility rank #5 · Founded 2022
FundingPips is a proprietary trading firm based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, founded in 2022. It offers one-step, two-step, instant-funding evaluations on forex, indices, commodities, crypto. Funded accounts go up to $100,000…
AI visibility score 1.5 / 100 · AI visibility rank #30 · Founded 2017
OneUp Trader is a proprietary trading firm based in Wilmington, United States, founded in 2017. It offers one-step evaluations on futures. Funded accounts go up to $250,000 (up to 3 funded accounts).…
FundingPips (Dubai, United Arab Emirates, founded 2022) scores 24.6 / 100 on the Q3 2026 AI Visibility Index (rank #5 of 76 prop firms), named in 33% of AI answers, runs Instant funding, One-step, Two-step evaluations, funds accounts up to $100,000 (up to $200,000 on selected models), pays a 80% (60% weekly, 90% on demand, 100% monthly) profit split and offers cTrader, MT5. OneUp Trader (Wilmington, United States, founded 2017) scores 1.5 / 100 on the Q3 2026 AI Visibility Index (rank #30 of 76 prop firms), named in 2% of AI answers, runs One-step evaluations, funds accounts up to $250,000 (up to 3 funded accounts), pays a 90% (100% of first $10,000) profit split and offers Bookmap, Jigsaw, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, NinjaTrader, R Trader, Sierra Chart.
Verdict at a glance
FundingPips leads on AI visibility, how often AI names it, AI sentiment, choice of evaluation models and asset-class range.
OneUp Trader leads on track record, platform choice, maximum allocation and profit split.
Scored on 9 measurable dimensions where both prop firms have verified data. Dimensions missing for either side are excluded rather than guessed. This is a data summary, not a recommendation.
FundingPips vs OneUp Trader: side-by-side data
Criteria
FundingPips
OneUp Trader
AI visibility score
24.6 / 100
1.5 / 100
AI visibility rank
#5
#30
Named in AI answers
33%
2%
AI sentiment (0–100)
30
2
Founded
2022
2017
Headquarters
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Wilmington, United States
Evaluation models
Instant funding, One-step, Two-step
One-step
Asset classes
Commodities, Crypto, Forex, Indices
Futures
Platforms
cTrader, MT5
Bookmap, Jigsaw, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, NinjaTrader, R Trader, Sierra Chart
Maximum allocation
$100,000 (up to $200,000 on selected models)
$250,000 (up to 3 funded accounts)
Profit split
80% (60% weekly, 90% on demand, 100% monthly)
90% (100% of first $10,000)
Challenge fee from
$29 ($5k 2-Step Pro)
$65/month ($25K; 50% paid upfront, balance on funding)
Account sizes
$5k, $10k, $25k, $50k, $100k
$25k, $50k, $100k, $150k, $250k
Payout frequency
weekly (Tuesday), bi-weekly, on demand or monthly (split varies)
on demand from day 1 (unlimited withdrawals)
Daily drawdown limit
5%
none
Maximum drawdown
10%
trailing $1,500 on $25K (6%), stops trailing at initial balance
Minimum trading days
3
10 (5 on Express)
Time limit
none
none
Weekend holding
Not verified
No
Status
active
active
Highlighted cells mark the stronger value where a direction is objectively better (e.g. more licences, lower fees). "Not verified" means the field is not yet in our catalogue for that prop firm — we never fill gaps with estimates.
AI visibility by engine: FundingPips vs OneUp Trader
Engine
FundingPips
OneUp Trader
ChatGPT
10.6
9.4
Perplexity
16.7
0
Gemini
56.2
0
Claude
23.2
0
Google AI Mode
41.6
0
Google AI Overview
12.4
0
Google top-10
0.5
0
Scores 0–100 from the Pipswire AI Visibility Index, Q3 2026. Higher means the engine names the firm more often and more favourably.
FundingPips vs OneUp Trader: common questions
Which prop firm do AI assistants recommend more, FundingPips or OneUp Trader?
FundingPips scores higher on the Q3 2026 Pipswire AI Visibility Index (24.6 / 100 vs 1.5 / 100), which measures how often ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google name a firm when traders ask which prop firm to use.
What profit split do FundingPips and OneUp Trader pay?
FundingPips pays 80% (60% weekly, 90% on demand, 100% monthly); OneUp Trader pays 90% (100% of first $10,000) (as published on each firm's site when we last checked).
Which is cheaper to start, FundingPips or OneUp Trader?
Entry-level challenge fees start at $29 ($5k 2-Step Pro) at FundingPips and $65/month ($25K; 50% paid upfront, balance on funding) at OneUp Trader. Fees change often and discounts are common, so treat these as the floor.
Which platforms do FundingPips and OneUp Trader support?
FundingPips: cTrader, MT5. OneUp Trader: Bookmap, Jigsaw, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, NinjaTrader, R Trader, Sierra Chart.
How do the drawdown rules compare at FundingPips and OneUp Trader?
FundingPips: maximum drawdown 10%, daily 5%. OneUp Trader: maximum drawdown trailing $1,500 on $25K (6%), stops trailing at initial balance, daily none.
Risk warning: prop firms are not regulated brokers or investment firms. Evaluations are paid, fees are usually non-refundable, most accounts are simulated, and a firm can change its rules or stop paying out. Most participants fail the evaluation. Nothing on this page is financial advice; read the firm's terms before you pay. Full risk disclosure.