Lucid Trading vs Rebels Funding (2026): rules, payouts, fees and AI visibility compared
Advertiser disclosure: some links on this page may be affiliate links, meaning BrokerCatalogue may earn a commission if you buy an evaluation. This never affects the data shown here, which is drawn from our catalogue and compared mechanically. How we make money.
Data refreshed 24 Sep 2026 · Compiled by David Ispiryan · Lucid Trading facts verified by BrokerCatalogue research desk (from the firm's own site) on 2026-09-24 · Rebels Funding facts verified by BrokerCatalogue research desk (from the firm's own site) on 2026-09-24
AI visibility score 3.3 / 100 · AI visibility rank #24 · Founded 2024
Lucid Trading is a proprietary trading firm based in Dover, United States, founded in 2024. It offers one-step, instant-funding evaluations on futures. Funded accounts go up to $150,000 (up to 5 funded…
AI visibility score 7 / 100 · AI visibility rank #13 · Founded 2023
Rebels Funding is a proprietary trading firm based in Czech Republic, founded in 2023. It offers one-step, two-step, three-step, instant-funding evaluations on forex, indices, commodities, crypto. Funded accounts go up to $320,000…
Lucid Trading (Dover, United States, founded 2024) scores 3.3 / 100 on the Q3 2026 AI Visibility Index (rank #24 of 76 prop firms), named in 5% of AI answers, runs Instant funding, One-step evaluations, funds accounts up to $150,000 (up to 5 funded accounts) and offers MotiveWave, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Rithmic, Tradesea, Tradovate. Rebels Funding (Czech Republic, founded 2023) scores 7 / 100 on the Q3 2026 AI Visibility Index (rank #13 of 76 prop firms), named in 8% of AI answers, runs Instant funding, One-step, Three-step, Two-step evaluations, funds accounts up to $320,000 (account growth up to 200% of initial), pays a 75% (up to 90%) profit split and offers Proprietary.
Verdict at a glance
Lucid Trading leads on platform choice.
Rebels Funding leads on AI visibility, how often AI names it, AI sentiment, track record, choice of evaluation models, asset-class range and maximum allocation.
Scored on 8 measurable dimensions where both prop firms have verified data. Dimensions missing for either side are excluded rather than guessed. This is a data summary, not a recommendation.
Lucid Trading vs Rebels Funding: side-by-side data
$5k, $10k, $20k, $40k (Gold 1-Phase), funded up to $320k
Payout frequency
same-day (about 15 minutes from request to bank per site)
Not verified
Daily drawdown limit
Not verified
none in evaluation; 4% on funded (RCF) account (Gold)
Maximum drawdown
Not verified
6% (Gold 1-Phase)
Minimum trading days
Not verified
none (minimum 8 real trades)
Time limit
none
none (999 days)
Weekend holding
No
Yes
Status
active
active
Highlighted cells mark the stronger value where a direction is objectively better (e.g. more licences, lower fees). "Not verified" means the field is not yet in our catalogue for that prop firm — we never fill gaps with estimates.
AI visibility by engine: Lucid Trading vs Rebels Funding
Engine
Lucid Trading
Rebels Funding
ChatGPT
2.1
0.6
Perplexity
2.5
0.2
Gemini
1.9
10.8
Claude
8.4
16.2
Google AI Mode
3.2
0.1
Google AI Overview
21.8
3
Google top-10
0
14.4
Scores 0–100 from the Pipswire AI Visibility Index, Q3 2026. Higher means the engine names the firm more often and more favourably.
Lucid Trading vs Rebels Funding: common questions
Which prop firm do AI assistants recommend more, Lucid Trading or Rebels Funding?
Rebels Funding scores higher on the Q3 2026 Pipswire AI Visibility Index (3.3 / 100 vs 7 / 100), which measures how often ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google name a firm when traders ask which prop firm to use.
Which platforms do Lucid Trading and Rebels Funding support?
Risk warning: prop firms are not regulated brokers or investment firms. Evaluations are paid, fees are usually non-refundable, most accounts are simulated, and a firm can change its rules or stop paying out. Most participants fail the evaluation. Nothing on this page is financial advice; read the firm's terms before you pay. Full risk disclosure.